Sustainability a Driver of Change in Project Management in Colombia
Keywords:
Sustainability, Project Management, Sustainable Projects, Sustainable Development, Construction, EnvironmentSynopsis
Sustainability is currently a topic of particular interest in various productive sectors that respond to existing global challenges in this trend. Within companies and organizations, there has been an increase in the attention and adoption of environmental, social, and economic considerations that balance the development and operation of their projects with the needs of the environment in which they operate. One of the disciplines that respond assertively to this context refers to project management, which, within its execution, allows the pertinent involvement of sustainable practices in different dimensions, stages, and levels of development.
In the Colombian context, the performance of this topic has permeated at different levels, from the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that involve different goals and actions to be carried out within the framework of the 2030 Agenda to the creation of entities such as the Consejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible (CCCS), which promotes and validates the inclusion of sustainable practices in the execution and performance of construction projects.
In this sense, this research makes a comprehensive analysis of the aspects that qualify the performance of sustainability in project management at a global level up to the perception in the Colombian context through the identification of the associated state of the art and the existing perceptions around the subject by the actors involved.
Thus, a systematic literature review was carried out guided by inclusion and exclusion criteria to delimit the object of study within the Scopus and Web of Science databases, to subsequently use bibliometric techniques for the processing, analysis, and visualization of the information collected, with the support of tools such as RStudio and VOSviewer. At the same time, an evaluation instrument was developed and applied to a representative sample of experts in the area, whose results were validated through Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as a statistical processing method.
As a result of this approach, a broad thematic panorama was obtained, marked by environmental and economic concepts related to resource management, circular economy, and environment, among others, diversifying the implementation of sustainable considerations in the international context. However, the results of the instrument allowed inferring that these considerations are not applied with the same dynamism at the national level, despite the availability of robust conceptual frameworks and diverse guidelines provided by sustainable management methodologies such as P5 and PRiSM or green building standards such as LEED, EDGE and Casa Colombia.
In general, the study provides valuable information for strategic decision making regarding the planning or intervention of future research, by presenting the main thematic fields that promote the development of the sector, as well as those that are losing relevance in the academic field in Colombia and the world. Due to the conceptual diversity evidenced, the topic not only has an impact on managers, but also involves diverse actors participating in the life cycle of a project, involving multidisciplinary perspectives, and broadening its scope.
This scenario is enhanced by the evaluation instrument developed, which stands out for the statistical validity and methodological practicality demonstrated. Its numerical and classificatory approach facilitates a detailed analysis and a selective intervention in the sample, adapting to the requirements of the user, sector or company that implements it to diagnose the knowledge of a specific group in the application of sustainability within project management.
Chapters
-
Preliminares
-
1. Introducción
-
2. Fundamentación teórica
-
3. Marco metodológico
-
4. Resultados
-
5. Análisis y discusiones
-
6. Conclusiones y recomendaciones para la implementación exitosa de proyectos sostenibles
-
8. ANEXOS
Downloads
References
Abdelrazek, A. F. (2019). Sustainability balanced scorecard: A comprehensive tool to measure sustainability performance. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 04(02), 948–962. www.ijsser.org
Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. WIREs Computational Statistics, 2(4), 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101
Acción RSE. (2007). Guía práctica para la elaboración de reportes de sustentabilidad.
Ahn, Y. H., Pearce, A. R., Wang, Y., & Wang, G. (2013). Drivers and barriers of sustainable design and construction: The perception of green building experience. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 4(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/2093761X.2012.759887
Almenara, J., González, C., García, P., & Peña, C. (1998). What is principal component analysis? Jano, 1268, 58–60.
Álvarez Osorio, M. C., & Zamarra Londoño, J. E. (2013). El informe social o de sostenibilidad como herramienta para dar cuenta de la RSE en las empresas. Contaduría Universidad de Antioquia, 57, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rc.15581
Andreadakis, A., Katsarelis, T., Adamopoulou, I., & Psarra, M. (2015). Infusing the PRiSMTM sustainability framework into the IPMA Project Excellence Model. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction (OTMC), September, 0–15. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/282291755
Armenia, S., Dangelico, R. M., Nonino, F., & Pompei, A. (2019). Sustainable project management: A conceptualization-oriented review and a framework proposal for future studies. Sustainability, 11(9), 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092664
Asobancaria. (2022). Hacia una construcción sostenible en Colombia. En Banca & Economía (pp. 1–10). www.yodecidomibanco.com
Association for Project Management. (2019). APM Body of Knowledge.
Azcona, S., & Ramos, F. (2011). Estudio de estándares y metodologías para la dirección de proyectos. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales y de Telecomunicación.
Azhar, S., Carlton, W. A., Olsen, D., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Building information modeling for sustainable design and LEED ® rating analysis. Automation in Construction, 20(2), 217–224. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.019
Bakens, W. (2003). Realizing the sector’s potencial for contributing to sustainable development. Industry and Environment, 26, 9–12.
Barrios Tano, K. del R., León Torres, E. P., & Blanco Rangel, I. (2020). Negocios Inclusivos y desarrollo económico en Colombia: El rol de la cooperación internacional. Panorama Económico, 28(4), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.32997/pe-2020-3328
Bartlett, E., & Howard, N. (2000). Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building. Building Research and Information, 28(5), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132100418474
Baumgärtner, S., Becker, C., Frank, K., Müller, B., & Quaas, M. (2008). Relating the philosophy and practice of ecological economics: The role of concepts, models, and case studies in interand transdisciplinary sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 7, 0–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.018
Benjumea, C. de la C. (2015). The quality of qualitative research: From evaluation to attainment. Texto e Contexto Enfermagem, 24(3), 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-070720150001150015
Berry, S., Moore, T., & Ambrose, M. (2019). Flexibility versus certainty: The experience of mandating a building sustainability index to deliver thermally comfortable homes. Energy Policy, 133(July), 110926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110926
Bianchini, F., & Hewage, K. (2012). Probabilistic social cost-benefit analysis for green roofs: A lifecycle approach. Building and Environment, 58, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.07.005
Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications. International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A Synthesis of styles. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770140212 Brolsma, D., & Kouwenhoven, M. (2017). Prince2 (6a ed.).
Brown, K. A. (1996). Workplace safety: A call for research. Journal of Operations Management, 14 (2), 157–171. https://doi. org/10.1016/0272-6963(95)00042-9
Bryde, D. (2008). Perceptions of the impact of project sponsorship practices on project success. International Journal of Project Management, 26(8), 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.12.001
Ca’ Foscari Universidad de Venecia. (2023). Sustainability Report 2020.
CAMACOL. (2021). EDGE Buildings. Certificación Sostenible de Edificaciones. https://camacol.co/productividad-sectorial/sostenibilidad/edge#:~:-text=Proceso de certificación-,Edge en Colombia,193 mil unidades vivienda certificadas.
Camps, D. (2008). Limitaciones de los indicadores bibliométricos en la evaluación de la actividad científica biomédica. Colombia Medica, 39(1), 74–79.
Carboni, J., Duncan, W., Gonzalez, M., Milsom, P., & Young, M. (2021). Sustainable Project Manag ement: The GPM Reference Guide. En Project Manager (Il) (Número 46). https://doi.org/10.3280/pm2021-046011
Carlowitz, H. (1713). Sylvicultura oeconomica. En The Future of Nature: Documents of Global Change.
Carter, C. R., & Easton, P. L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain mana- gement: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 41(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111101420
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
CASA COLOMBIA. (2023). Aporte a la Agenda Global para el Desarrollo Sostenible.
Castaño, C. (2013). Los pilares del desarrollo sostenible: Sofisma o realidad. En Proyecto de Virtualización VUAD (Número 12). http://soda.ustadistancia.edu.co/enlinea/eduvirtual/TextosDigitales/Desarrollo-Sostenible/files/assets/downloads/publication.pdf
Castro, A., Lozano, F., & Solarte, J. (2014). Criterios Para La Implementación Del Estándar Prince2 [Universidad San Buenaventura]. http://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstream/10819/2321/1/Criterios_Implementacion_Estandar_Prince_2_Castro_2014.pdf
Castro Agudelo, G. A., & Luna Serna, D. C. (2021). Valoración de un proyecto de energía solar en Colombia, implementando opciones reales. Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA.
CECODES. (2022). Memoria de Sostenibilidad 2021.
Chavarro, Vélez, Tovar, Montenegro, Hernández, O. (2018). Los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible en Colombia y el aporte de la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación. En “Patrimonio”: Economía Cultural Y Educación Para La Paz (Mec-Edupaz) (Vol. 2, Número 14).
Ciliberti, F., de Groot, G., de Haan, J., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2009). Codes to coordinate supply chains: SMEs’ experiences with SA8000. Supply Chain Management, 14(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910941984
Closs, D. J., Speier, C., & Meacham, N. (2010). Sustainability to support end-to-end value chains: the role of supply chain management. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0207-4
Closs, D. J., Speier, C., & Meacham, N. (2011). Sustainability to support end-to-end value chains: the role of supply chain management. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-010-0207-4
CO2Cero. (2023). Proyectos de Carbono – CO2CERO. Proyectos de Carbono. Cole, R. J. (2000). Editorial: Cost and Value In Building Green.
Building Research & Information, 28(5–6), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132100418456
Comisión Nacional Forestal. (2016). Documento del Paquete de Preparación para REDD+ para el Fondo Cooperativo para el Carbono de los Bosques.
Conboy, K. (2009). Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0236
Constitucion Política de Colombia, 108 (1991). Ley 99 de 1993, 58 (1993).
Consejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible. (2021a). Caso de Negocio de LEED en Latinoamérica. www.cccs.org.co
Consejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible. (2021b). Estado de la Construcción Sostenible en Colombia. www.cccs.org.co
Consejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible. (2022). Directorio de proyectos CASA COLOMBIA. https://casa.cccs.org.co/proyectos-casa/
Consejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible. ( 2023 ). LEED en Colombia.
Consejo Empresarial Colombiano para el Desarrollo Sostenible (CECODES). (2021). CECODES: Compromiso empresarial con la sostenibilidad.
Cottrell, R. F. (2015). The DGNB as a proto/institution for sustainable certification in Denmark. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1466.7364
De Smet, A., Gao, W., Henderson, K., & Hundertmark, T. (2021). Organizing for sustainability success: Where, and how, leaders can start. Mckinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/organizing-for-sustaina-bility-success-where-and-how-leaders-can-start
Deloitte. (2022). Normas Internacionales de Sostenibilidad y Clima (NIIF S1 y NIIF S2).
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Sinead, P., & Brown, C. (2017). The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability. Healing Capitalism: Five Years in the Life of Business, Finance and Corporate Responsibility, 300(May 2009), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351276481
Departamento de Planeación Nacional - DNP. (2018). CONPES 3918. Estrategia para la implementación de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) en Colombia. Documento Conpes 3918, 74. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Económicos/3918.pdf
Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP). (2022). Informe anual de Avance en la implementación de los ODS en Colombia. Informe ODS 2020, 10–27. https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Económicos/3918.pdf
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen, D. (2023). The DGNB’s role as an association – Europe’s biggest network for sustainable building.
Ding, G. K. C. (2008). Sustainable construction-The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025
Ding, G. K. C. (2010). Sustainability assessment of residential deve- lopment - An Australian experience. International Journal of Construction Management, 10(2), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2010.10773142
Dinsmore, P., & Canabis-Brewin, J. (2014). The AMA Handbook of Project Management (4a ed.).
Duan, P., Chen, S., Zhang, H., & Zhang, F. (2021). Grain for Green Project in farmers’ minds: perceptions, aspirations and behaviours in eco-fragile region, Xinjiang, China. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 13(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-06-2020-0069
EDGE. (2023). Certificación.
EPA. (2007). Sustainability Research Strategy (Número October). http://epa.gov/sciencematters/april2011/pdf/EPA-12057_SRS_4.pdf
Equipo de Redactores Legis. (2022). Los principales proyectos sostenibles en Colombia. https://blog.legis.com.co/construccion/principales-proyectos-sostenibles-colombia
Feldman Mowerman, D. J., & Quiñones Sánchez, I. D. (2013). Centro de Desarrollo Infantil El Guadual. https://www.archdaily.co/co/625198/centro-de-desarrollo-infantil-el-guadual-daniel-joseph-feld-man-mowerman-ivan-dario-quinones-sanchez
Fernández, R. (2011). La dimensión económica del desarrollo sostenible. En La dimensión económica del desarrollo sostenible. Gamma.
Garavito, C. (2019). La construcción de este colegio sostenible en Cauca salvó la comunidad. Revista AXXIS. https://revistaaxxis.com.co/arquitectura/la-sostenibilidad-como-necesidad/
Gareis, R., Huemann, M., & Martinuzzi, A. (2013). Project management and sustainable development principles: A conceptual model. Defining the Future of Project Management, 1–4. https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/research/research-sum-maries/gareis_-pm-and-sustainable-development.pdf
Gemino, A., Horner Reich, B., & Serrador, P. M. (2021). Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice? Project Management Journal, 52(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820973082
Gerner, M. (2019). Assessing and managing sustainability in international perspective: corporate sustainability across cultures – towards a strategic framework implementation approach. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility 2019 4:1, 4(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40991-019-0043-X
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Gigliotti, M., Schmidt-Traub, G., & Bastianoni, S. (2018). The sustainable development goals. En Encyclopedia of Ecology (2a ed.). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10986-8
Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). Guía para la elaboración de memorias de sostenibilidad G4. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourceli-brary/Spanish-G4-Part-One.pdf
Global Reporting Initiative, & Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. (2021). A practical guide to sustainability reporting using GRI and SASB standards. https://www.sasb.org/knowledge-hub/practical-guide-to-sustainability-reporting-using-gri-and-sasb-s tandards/
Gómez Vargas, M., Galeano Higuita, C., & Jaramillo Muñoz, D. A. (2015). El estado del arte: Una metodología de investigación. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales, 6(2), 423. https://doi.org/10.21501/22161201.1469
GPM Global. (2014). El Estándar P5TM de GPM global para la sostenibilidad en la dirección de proyectos (1a ed.).
Gray, P. C. R., & Wiedemann, P. M. (1999). Risk management and sustainable development: mutual lessons from approaches to the use of indicators. Journal of Risk Research, 2(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698799376808
Green Project Management Global. (2023). The GPM® P5TM Standard for Sustainability in Project Management. www.greenprojectma-nagement.org
Grupo Ecopetrol. (2021). Grupo Ecopetrol, Cenit y AES pusieron en operación el Parque Solar San Fernando en el Meta. https://www.ecopetrol.com.co/wps/portal/Home/es/noticias/detalleNoticia/?page=detalleNoticias&urile=wcm:path%3A%2FEcopetrol_WCM_Library%2FAS_es%2FNoticias%2FNoticias%2B2021%2Fgru-po-ecopetrol-ceni-aes-inauguraron-parque-solar-san-fernando
Guevara, R. (2016). El estado del arte en la investigación. Folios, 44, 165–179. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/folios/n44/n44a11.pdf
Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
Highsmith, J., & Fowler, M. (2010). The agile Manifesto.
Holmes, S. M., Power, M., & Walter, C. (1996). A Motor Carrier Wellness Program: Development and testing. Transportation Journal, 35(3), 33–48.
Hood, W., & Wilson, C. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342
Hunter, D., Sommer, J., & Vaughan, S. (1994). Concepts and Principles of international Environment Law An Introduction.
Hwang, B.-G., Zhu, L., & Ming, J. T. T. (2017). Factors affecting productivity in Green Building construction projects: The case of Singapore. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000499
IESALC. (1998). Conferencia mundial sobre la educación superior (Vol. 9, Número 2). https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/ess/index.php/ess3/issue/view/21
Insuasti Vidal, M. de J. (2021). Traditional standards and agile methodologies in project management. Ciencia y Educación, 2(5), 16–23.
International Finance Corporation. (2021). EDGE User guide v 3.0.a.
International Trade Centre. (2019). Mainstreaming sustainable and inclusive development: Guidelines for International Trade Centre projects.
International Well Building Institute. (2015). The Well building standard v1. https://standard.wellcertified.com/sites/standard.wellcertified.com.v3/files/The WELL Building Standard September 2015.pdf
IPMA. (2015). Base para la Competencia Individual - Dominio Dirección de Proyectos (Vol. v4). file:///C:/Users/hp/Downloads/ICB4.pdf
ISO 21500:2012, (2012).
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Jollife, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
Jolliffe, I. (2010). Principal components analysis. En International Encyclopedia of Education (Segunda ed). Springer. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01358-0
Kamar, K. A. M., Zuhairi Abd. Hamid, Mohd Khairolden Ghani, Egbu, C., & Mohammed Arif. (2010). Collaboration Initiative on Green Construction and Sustainability through Industrialized Buildings Systems (IBS) in the Malaysian Construction Industry. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology, 119–127.
Kassambara, A. (2017). Multivariate analysis II: Practical Guide To Principal Component Methods in R: PCA, M (CA), FAMD, MFA, HCPC, factoextra. Sthda, 2, 1–155.
Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment, 47(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444
Kerzner, H. (2022). Project Management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling.
Khalifeh, A., Farrell, P., & Al-edenat, M. (2020). The impact of project sustainability management (PSM) on project success: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management Development, 39(4), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-02-2019-0045
Khoshbakht, M., Gou, Z., & Dupre, K. (2017). Cost-benefit prediction of Green Buildings: SWOT analysis of research methods and recent applications. Procedia Engineering, 180, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.176
Kibert, C. (2003). Forward: Sustainable construction at the start of the 21st century. International Electronic Journal of Construction, 1–7.
Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction Green Building desing and delivery (4a ed.). Wiley.
Kisku, N., Joshi, H., Ansari, M., Panda, S. K., Nayak, S., & Dutta, S. C. (2017). A critical review and assessment for usage of recycled aggregate as sustainable construction material. Construction and Building Materials, 131, 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.029
Klaassen, R. J., Brouwer, D., & Kolk, A. (2017). The impact of sustainable project management on project success. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 467–476.
Kotob, F. (2011). What Is Sustainability? 1–26.
Lastra, X., & Ramírez, M. (2020). Caracterización de los Sistemas de Indicadores de Sostenibilidad y su Evolución. 12th International Conference on Project Engineering, 1638–1648.
Liébana Carrasco, Ó. (2021). Metodologías ágiles para la gestión de proyectos de construcción. https://www.e-zigurat.com/es/blog/metodologias-agiles-gestion-proyectos-construccion/
Madroñero-Palacios, S., & Guzmán-Hernández, T. (2018). Desarrollo sostenible. Aplicabilidad y sus tendencias. Revista Tecnología en Marcha, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v31i3.3907
McCausland, E. (2021). Cultura Profesional para un Horizonte 2030.
Profesiones, 194, 54–55.
Miles, M. P., & Munilla, L. S. (2004). The potential impact of social accountability certification on marketing: A short note. Journal of Business Ethics, 50 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000021139.94166.74
Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. (2023). Programas/ proyectos REDD+. https://www.minambiente.gov.co/cambio-climatico-y-gestion-del-riesgo/programas-proyectos-redd/
Mohd Turan, F., & Johan, K. (2016). Assessing sustainability framework of automotiverelated industry in the malaysiacontext based on GPM P5 standard. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(12), 7606–7611.
Mollenkopf, D., Closs, D., Twede, D., Lee, S., & Burgess, G. (2005). Assessing the viability of reusable packaging: A relative cost approach. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.2158-1592.2005.TB00198.X
Montoya, C. A. (2011). El Balanced Scorecard como herramienta de evaluación en la gestión administrativa. Visión de Futuro, 15, 2–26. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=357935478003
Mulder, K. (2004). Engineering education in sustainable development: Sustainability as a tool to open up the windows of engineering institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.407
Muñoz, L. F., & Hurtado, J. A. (2012). XP/Architecture: Un modelo Ágil para Escalar XP. Revista Colombiana de Computación, 13(2), 124–140.
Muradas, Y. ( 2018 ). Metodologías ágiles para l a ges tión de proyectos. https://openwebinars.net/blog/conoce-las-3-metodologias-agiles-mas-usadas/
Naciones Unidas. (2007). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. En New York (Número October).
Naciones Unidas, P. (2018). La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe Gracias por su interés en esta publicación de la CEPAL. En Publicación de las Naciones Unidas. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40155/24/S1801141_es.pdf
Northbridge Environmental Management Consultants. (2003). Analyzing the cost of obtaining LEED certification. En El Consejo Americano de Química.
Obel, B., & Kallehave, P. (2022). Designing a sustainable organization: the four I’s framework. Journal of Organization Design, 11(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41469-022-00122-W/TABLES/2
Obradovićl, V., Todorović, M., & Bushuyev, S. (2018). Sustainability and Agility in Project Management: Contradictory or Complementary? International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, 2, 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1109/STC-CSIT.2018.8526666
ONU. (1984). Carta Mundial de la Naturaleza. En Environmental Policy and Law (Vol. 13, Números 3–4). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-777X(84)80089-X
ONU. (1987). Our common future.
ONU. (1992). Agenda 21 (Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412971867. n128
ONU. (1995). Declaración de Copenhague sobre Desarrollo Social. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812205381.421
ONU. (2002). Informe de la Cumbre Mundial sobre el Desarrollo Sostenible. ONU. (2012). El futuro que queremos.
ONU. (2020). Los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv14t4706
Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1745-493X.2010.03212.X
Peña, D. (2002). Análisis de datos multivariados. McGraw-Hill. Perkins Marsh, G. (1864). Man and Nature. W. Clowes and sons.
Pineda Escobar, M. A., & Falla Villa, P. L. (2016). Los negocios inclusivos como fuente de trabajo de calidad para pequeñas empresarias en condición de pobreza: un estudio exploratorio en el municipio de Apartadó, Colombia. Equidad y Desarrollo, 1(25), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.19052/ed.3529
PMI. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide).
PMI. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7a ed.).
PNUMA. (2013). Greening universities toolkit: Transforming universities into Green and Sustainable Campuses: A Toolkit for Implementers. United Nation Environment Programme, 1, 93. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/toolkits-manuals-and-guides/greening-universities-toolkit-v20%0Ahttps://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/11964/Greening University Toolkit V2.0.pdf
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2007). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92. https://hazrevista.org/wp-content/uploads/strategy-society.pdf
Quiroga, R. (2001). Indicadores de sostenibilidad ambiental y de desarrollo sostenible: Estado del arte y perspectivas (Vol. 16). http://www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/xml/8/9708/lcl1607e_ind.pdf
Ralph, M., & Stubbs, W. (2014). Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. Higher Education, 67(1), 71–90. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10734-013-9641-9
Rehm, M., & Ade, R. (2013). Construction costs comparison between green and conventional office buildings. Building Research and Information, 41(2), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.769145
Robert, B., & Brown, E. B. (2004). Qualitative inquiry and research design (Número 1).
Robichaud, L. B., & Anantatmula, V. S. (2011). Greening Project Management Practices for Sustainable Construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000030
Rodríguez-Guerra, L. C., & Ríos-Osorio, L. A. (2016). Evaluación de Sostenibilidad con Metodología GRI. Dimensión Empresarial, 14(2), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.15665/rde.v14i2.659
Rodríguez, M. D., Sáenz, R. G., Arroyo, H. M., Herera, D. P., de la Rosa Barranco, D., & Caballero-Uribe, C. V. (2009). Bibliometría: Conceptos y utilidades para el estudio médico y la formación professional. Salud Uninorte, 25(2), 319–330.
Rosokhata, A., Minchenko, M., Khomenko, L., & Chygryn, O. (2021). Renewable energy: A bibliometric analysis. E3S Web of Conferences, 250, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125003002
Sabiote, C. R., Llorente, T. P., & Pérez, J. G. (2006). Analytical triangu- lation, a resource for the validity of recurrent survey studies and reply researches in higher education. RELIEVE - Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa, 12(2), 289–305.
Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2206–2211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0
Salcedo Díaz, L., Porto Solano, A. F., Echeverry Gutiérrez, C., Boss Agudelo, J., & Moreno Ortiz, C. A. (2016). Responsabilidad Social Empresarial: Modelo de procesos de desarrollo de productos con base en la Metodología PRiSM y la Estrategia P5. Producción + Limpia, 11(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.22507/pml.v11n2a10
Sarmiento, J., Medina, M., & Gutiérrez, Ó. (2018). Caracterización de la gerencia de proyectos de construcción en la ciudad de Tunja (1a. ed.). Editorial UPTC. https://editorial.uptc.edu.co/gpd-caracterizacion-de-la-gerencia-de-proyectos-de-construccion-en-la-ciudad-de-tunja-9789586603256.html
SASB. (2013). Exposición del marco conceptual de SASB.
Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sus- tainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environmental Development, 17, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002
SCRUMstudy. (2016). Una guía para el conocimento de Scrum (Guía SBOKTM). SCRUMstudy.
SCRUMstudy. (2017). Una guía para el conocimiento de Scrum (Guía SBOKTM) (3a ed.). SCRUMstud.
Shi, Q., Zuo, J., Huang, R., Huang, J., & Pullen, S. (2013). Identifying the critical factors for green construction - An empirical study in China. Habitat International, 40, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.01.003
Sierra, L. A., Pellicer, E., & Yepes, V. (2016). Sostenibilidad social en el ciclo de vida de las infraestructuras públicas chilenas. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001099
Silvius, A. J. G., & Schipper, R. P. J. (2014a). Sustainability in project management competencies: Analyzing the competence gap of project managers. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 02(02), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2014.22005
Silvius, A. J. G., & Schipper, R. P. J. (2014b). Sustainability in project mana- gement: A literature review and impact analysis. Social Business, 4(1), 63–96. https://doi.org/10.1362/204440814X13948909253866
Simões-Coelho, M. F., & Figueira, A. R. (2021). Why do companies engage in sustainability? Propositions and a framework of motivations. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 18(2). https://doi. org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2021190042
Simões-Coelho, M., Figueira, A. R., & Russo, E. (2023). Motivations for a sustainable ethos: evidence from the globally present Brazilian multinational Natura &Co. Environment Systems and Decisions, 43, 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-022-09890-y
Simonelli, R. (1994). SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE: A Look at Science Through Historic Eyes and. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769401400101
Solano, E., Castellanos, S., López, M. M., & Hernández, J. (2009). La bibliometría: Una herramienta eficaz para evaluar la actividad científica postgraduada. Revista Electrónica de las Ciencias Médicas en Cienfuegos, 7(4), 291–294.
Sotelo, J. A., Tolón, A., & Lastra, X. (2011). Indicadores por y para el desarrollo sostenible, un estudio de caso. Estudios Geograficos, 72(271), 611–654. https://doi.org/10.3989/estgeogr.201124
Stadtländer, C. T. K.-H. (2009). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed- Methods Research. Microbe Magazine, 4(11), 485–485. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.4.485.1
Stephens, J. C., Hernandez, M. E., Román, M., Graham, A. C., & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 317–338. https://doi. org/10.1108/14676370810885916
Strange, I. (1997). Planning for change, conserving the past: towards sustainable development policy in historic cities? Cities, 14(4), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00007-3
Tam, V. W. Y., Soomro, M., & Evangelista, A. C. (2018). A review of recycled aggregate in concrete applications. Construction and Building Materials, 172, 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2018.03.240
Timans, R., Wouters, P., & Heilbron, J. (2019). Mixed methods research: what it is and what it could be. Theory and Society, 48(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09345-5
To, W. M., & Lam, K. H. (2022). Green project management from employees’ perspective in Hong Kong’s engineering and construction sectors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(4), 1890–1907. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0838
Truant, E., Corazza, L., & Scagnelli, S. D. (2017). Sustainability and risk disclosure: An exploratory study on sustainability reports. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040636
UI Green Metric. (2023). Clasificación general 2023. https://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/rankings/overall-rankings-2023
UNEP. (2012). 2011 Annual Report.
UNESCO. (2021). Ingeniería para el desarrollo sostenible. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375634_spa
Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. (1980). World conservation strategy.
Unión Interprofesional de la Comunidad de Madrid. (2018). Compromiso de UICM y los Colegios Profesionales de la Comunidad de Madrid con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS). https://www.uicm.es/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/COMPROMISO-UICM-Y-CCPP-CON-LOS-ODS-2018-Texto-y-Preámbulo.pdf
University of Copenhagen. (2022). Sustainable institution 2030. https://sustainability2030.ku.dk/pdfer/B_redygtighedsm_l_2030_UK.pdf_copy
Uribe-Macías, M. E., Vargas-Moreno, Ó. A., & Merchán-Paredes, L. (2017). La responsabilidad social empresarial y la sostenibilidad, criterios habilitantes en la gerencia de proyectos. Entramado, 14(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2018v14n1.27107
US Green Building Council. (2023a). LEED v4.1 – Diseño y construcción de edificios.
US Green Building Council. (2023b). LEED v4.1 – Diseño y construcción de edificios.
US Green Building Council. (2023c). LEED v4.1 – Interior Diseño y construcción.
Vert. (2020). Consejo de Normas Internacionales de Sostenibilidad (ISSB). https://investorcloud.s3.amazonaws.com/Vert/ISSB.pdf
Vinod, A., Sanjay, M. R., Suchart, S., & Jyotishkumar, P. (2020). Renewable and sustainable biobased materials: An assessment on biofibers, biofilms, biopolymers and biocomposites. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120978
Wageningen University & Research. (2020). Sustainability Report. 1–64.
Wangler, T., Roussel, N., Bos, F. P., Salet, T. A. M., & Flatt, R. J. (2019). Digital concrete: A review. Cement and Concrete Research, 123, 105780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105780
Weiss, C. (1988). Sustainable macro-projects. Technology in Society, 10(3), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(88)90019-X
WELL Standard. (2021). WELL Standard.
White, P. (2009). Building a sustainability strategy into the business. Corporate Governance, 9 (4), 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700910984936
World Energy Trade. (2020). Para el 2021 operativo megaparque solar San Fernando en Colombia - World Energy Trade. https://www.worldenergytrade.com/energias-alternativas/energia-solar/para-el-2021-operativo-megaparque-solar-san-fernando-en-colombia
Wu, L., Subramanian, N., Abdulrahman, M. D., Liu, C., & Pawar, K. S. (2017). Short-term versus long-term benefits: Balanced sustainability framework and research propositions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 11, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. SPC.2016.09.003
Wu, Z., Jiang, M., Cai, Y., Wang, H., & Li, S. (2019). What hinders the development of green building? An investigation of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(17), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173140
Yilmaz, M., & Bakıs, A. (2015). Sustainability in construction sector. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 2253–2262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.312
Zavyalova, E., Sokolov, D., & Lisovskaya, A. (2020). Agile vs traditio- nal project management approaches. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(5), 1095–1112. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2019-1857
Downloads
Published
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.