Institutional Management Model for Research and Innovation in Higher Education Institutions in Latin America

Authors

Elizabeth Bernal Gamboa; Diana Granados Falla; César Pallares; Alfonso Marzal; César Pallares; Claudia Milena Díaz Ulloa; Diana Granados Falla; Eder Guillermo Herrera Pérez; Elizabeth Bernal Gamboa; Elizabeth Colucci; Enrique Vera López; Erika Ospina Rozo; Francisco Vergara González; Guillermo Alfonso Parra; Luisa Fernanda Prado; Nicolas Patrici; Óscar Herrera Sandoval; Sally Estay Alcaíno; Susan Benavides; Yeison Alberto Garcés Gómez; Zaida Zarely Ojeda Pérez

Keywords:

Higher Education, Institutional management, Research, Innovation, Institutional policy

Synopsis

The Institutional Management Model for Research and Innovation in Higher Education Institutions in Latin America is the result of the Erasmus+ Project, co-financed by the European Union, in which 20 universities, government entities, agencies and associations from Spain, Italy, Sweden, Colombia, Chile and Peru participated, called “Modernization of the Institutional Management of Research and Innovation in the Andean Region of Latin America - MIMIR Andino”. In this publication, the stages followed in the construction of the model are briefly presented, as well as its guiding principles and differential  elements. The model proposes a management that integrates four components: Strategic, Execution, Relational and Administrative. Reflections and suggestions are included in each of the components to be considered, adapted or applied, when deemed appropriate, within the framework of the institution’s autonomy, to improve its R&D&i management. Finally, a synthetic map of the model is included, as well as general recommendations and clues for its monitoring and implementation. It is suggested to use this model in conjunction with the Institutional Self-assessment Instrument for R&D&i Management MIMIR Andino, that can be found on the pages https://mimirandino.org and https://ascun.org.co.

Chapters

  • Preliminares
  • Modelo de Gestión Institucional de la Investigación y la Innovación en Instituciones de Educación Superior de América Latina
  • Glosario
  • Abreviaturas
  • Referencias

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahn, S.-Y. (2022). A Study on Improvement of Research Ethic System in University. Journal of Digital Convergence, 20(1), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2022.20.1.203

Al-Ubaydli, O., Lee, M. S., List, J. A., & Suskind, D. (2021). The Science of Using Science. A New Framework for Understanding the Threats to Scaling Evidence-Based Policies. En The Scale-Up Effect in Early Childhood and Public Policy (p. 22). Routledge.

Aukes, E., Kuhlmann, S., & Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. (2021, julio 22). Reshape science diplomacy for an nterconnected world [Research Proffesional News]. Research Proffesional News. https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-europe-views-of-europe-2021-7-reshape-science-diplomacy-for-an-interconnected-world/?utm_source=pocket_mylist

Bejinaru, R. (2017). Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities. Management & Marketing, 12(3), 500-523. ABI/INFORM Collection; ProQuest Central. https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2017-0030

Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 489-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00253

Bengoetxea, E., & Buela-Casal, G. (2013). The new multidimensional and user-driven higher education ranking concept of the European Union. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13(1), 67-73.

Brattström, E., & Hellström, T. (2019). Street-level priority-setting: The role of discretion in implementation of research, development, and innovation priorities. Energy Policy, 127, 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.006

Bruno, I., Donarelli, A., Marchetti, V., Schiavone Panni, A., Valente Covino, B., Lobo, G., & Molinari, F. (2020). Technology Readiness revisited: A proposal for extending the scope of impact assessment of European public services. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2020), 00. https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/sites/default/files/technology_readiness_revisited_-_icegov2020.pdf

Bryson, J.M.; Edwards, L.H; Van Slyke, D.M. Getting strategic about strategic planning research, Public Management Review, 20:3, 317-339, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1285111

Castro Martínez, E., & Vega Jurado, J. (2009). Las relaciones universidad-entorno socioeconómico en el espacio iberoamericano del conocimiento. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 4(12), 71-81.

Colciencias. (2016). Actores de Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Bogotá: https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/upload/reglamentacion/politiciadeactores-snI+D+i.pdf.

Colciencias (s.f). Frequently Asked Questions. Obtenido de: https://legadoweb.minciencias.gov.co/faq/qu-es-un-grupo-de-investigaci-n

Connell, H. (Ed.). (2005). University Research Management: Meeting the Institutional Challenge. OECD Publishing. 10.1787/9789264017450-en

Costas, R. (2022). Hacia la construcción colectiva de la evaluación científica (y el rol de la cienciometría). Encuentro Nacional de Vicerrectorías de Investigación o Similares Ascun, Disponible en: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYtszPDs5fI&t=16s.

Cricelli, L., Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Llanes Dueñas, L. P. (2018). Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2017-0037

Cuevas Badallo, A., & Urueña López, S. (2019). Públicos y actores en la democratización de la actividad científica. Revista CTS, XIV(42). http://ojs.revistacts.net/index.php/CTS/article/view/127

De Ricjke, S., & Bonilla, A. (2021, julio 13). Reconocimiento científico e incentivos para la carrera del investigador [Youtube]. Café Mimir Andino. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxnYvXyvjjs

El-Jardali, F., Ataya, N., & Fadlallah, R. (2018). Changing roles of universities in the era of SDGs: Rising up to the global challenge through institutionalising partnerships with governments and communities. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0318-9.

Ferrére, A., Rider, C., Renerte, B., & Edmondson, A. (2022). Fostering ethical conduct through psychological safety. MIT Sloan Management Review, 63 (4). Pps. 39-44.

George, B., Walker, Richard M., & Monster, J. (2020). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A Meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 79(6), pps. 810-819. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13104

Giuri, P., Munari, F., Scandura, A., & Toschi, L. (s. f.). The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities. Technological Forecasting and social change, 138, 261-278

Holmström, B. (1999). Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00083

INORMS. (2021). The SCOPE Framework: A five-stage process for evaluating research responsibly (p. 19) [Reporte]. https://inorms.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21655-scope-guide-v9-1636013361_cc-by.pdf

Jones, MG, Chesnutt, K, Ennes, M, Mulvey, KL, Cayton, E. Understanding science career aspirations: Factors predicting future science task value. J Res Sci Teach. 2021; 58: 937– 955. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21687

Kaivo-oja, J. (2006). Towards Integration of Innovation Systems and Foresight Research in Firms and Corporations: The Classical Takeuchi-Nonaka Model Reconsidered and Reformulated. Finland Futures Research Center.

Kwiek, M. Internationalists and locals: international research collaboration in a resource-poor system. Scientometrics 124, 57–105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03460-2

Meder, D., Morales, M., Pepperkok, R., Schlapbach, R., Tiran, A., & Van Minnebruggen, G. (2016). Institutional core facilities: prerequisite for breakthroughs in the life sciences. EMBO reports, 1088-1093.

Morales Rubiano, m. E., Sanabria Rangel, p. E., & Caballero Martínez, d. (2015). Características de la vinculación universidad-entorno en la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas: Investigación y Reflexión, XXIII(1), 189-208. Redalyc.

Nava Amezcua, A. (2022). Democratización de la ciencia… ¿y de la tecnociencia? Sincronía, XXVI (82), 1562-384X. https://doi.org/10.32870/sincronia.axxvi.n82.

Observatorio Iberoamericano de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Sociedad (OCTS-OEI), & Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología (RICYT). (2017). Manual de Valencia: Manual Iberoamericano de indicadores de vinculación de la universidad con el entorno socioeconómico (p. 96). https://www.ovtt.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Manual_Valencia.pdf

OCDE. (2015). Manual de Frascati. Guía para la recopilación y presentación de información sobre la investigación y el desarrollo experimental. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264310681-es: Fundación Española para la Cincia y la Tecnología. .

OCDE. (2018). Manual de Oslo. Guía para la colección, reporte y uso de datos para la innovación. https://icono.fecyt.es/sites/default/files/filepublicaciones/manualoslo2018.pdf.

OCDE. (febrero de 2020). Policy analysis and discovery tool for better decision-making. Obtenido de https://stip.oecd.org/stip.html

Prendergast, C. (1999). The Provision of Incentives in Firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 7-63. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.1.7

Quintanilla Fisac, M. A. Q., & López, S. M. (2018). Una nueva agenda para la política científica. Sistema, 249, 15.

Rivera, S. C., Galvis, M., Cárdenas-Osorio, J., & Pallares, C. (2013). Análisis del recurso humano vinculado a grupos de investigación en universidades colombianas: Una aproximación a los indicadores de trayectorias científicas y tecnológicas. En Observando el Sistema Colombiano de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación: Sus actores y sus productos (Primera, p. 428). Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología.

Rodríguez Muñoz, R. y Pérez Fernández D. R. (2018). Perfeccionamiento de la gestión por procesos en una universidad. En Revista Científica “Visión de Futuro”, vol. 22, núm. 2, pp. 192-213.

Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011

Silenskyte, A. (2020). Corporate strategy implementation: how strategic plans become individual strategic actions across organizational levels of the MNC. Tesis Doctoral. Acta Wasaensia, 446. Universidad de Vaasa. Pps. 336

Sucozhañay, Dolores, Machado, Maria Antonia, De Witte, Karel, & Euwema, Martin. (2012). La gestión del cambio en universidades: Una mirada desde la estructura organizacional.

Uria López, S., & Rodríguez Cruz, Y. (s. f.). INTELIGENCIA ORGANIZACIONAL: APROXIMACIÓN TEÓRICA A SU CONCEPCIÓN Y DESARROLLO. Informacao & Informacao, 24(1), 356. https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n1p356

Vanegas, J. A. (2019). Taller de Fundamentos y Herramientas para la Gestión de la Investigación en Instituciones de Educación Superior de Colombia. Bogotá: ASCUN.

Vélez-Cuartas, G., Uribe Tirado, A., Pallares, C., & Ochoa-Gutierrez. (2019). Métricas de vinculación Universidad-entorno: Universidad de Antioquia. Universidad de Antioquia.

Villa González, E. y Pons Murguía, R (2006) Un procedimiento para la Gestión por Procesos.

Wilsdon, J. (2016). The metric tide: The independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment & management. (p. 180). https://responsiblemetrics.org/the-metric-tide/

WIPO. (s.f.). Preguntas frecuentes: Transferencia de conocimientos en las universidades. Obtenido de https://www.wipo.int/about-ip/es/universities_research/ip_knowledgetransfer/faqs/

Z. Juan, L. Wei, & P. Xiamei. (2010). Research on Technology Transfer Readiness Level and Its Application in University Technology Innovation Management. 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government, 1904-1907. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE.2010.481

Zall, J. & Rist, R.,. (2004). Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System. Washington D.C.: Workd Bank, pp. 268.

Zhao, L. (2021). Problems and suggestions for the scientific rsearch management system of universities. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 5(6), 5.

Downloads

Published

20 October 2022

Details about this monograph

ISBN-13 (15)

978-958-8481-56-2